|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910810049703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Johnson David E (David Eugene), <1950-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Fast tanks and heavy bombers : innovation in the U.S. Army, 1917-1945 / / David E. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Ithaca, : Cornell University Press, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-8014-6710-1 |
1-322-50420-2 |
0-8014-6711-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (304 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cornell studies in security affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Weapons systems - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 277-283) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Part I. Soldiers and Machines: 1917-1920 -- 1. America, the Army, and the Great War -- 2. The Tank Corps -- 3. The Air Service -- 4. The Army in the Aftermath of the Great War -- Part II. Inertia and Insurgency: 1921-1930 -- 5. Peace and Quiet -- 6. Infantry Tanks -- 7. The Failed Revolution and the Evolution of Air Force -- 8. The War Department -- Part III. Alternatives and Autonomy: 1931-1942 -- 9. From Domestic Depression to International Crusade -- 10. Alternatives for Armor -- 11. Autonomous Air Power -- 12. A Crisis in the War Department -- Part IV. Dying for Change: 1942-1945 -- 13. The Arsenal of Attrition -- 14. Armored Bludgeon -- 15. Air Force Triumphant -- 16. Coequal Land Power and Air Power -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Primary Sources -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The U.S. Army entered World War II unprepared. In addition, lacking Germany's blitzkrieg approach of coordinated armor and air power, the army was organized to fight two wars: one on the ground and one in the air. Previous commentators have blamed Congressional funding and public apathy for the army's unprepared state. David E. Johnson believes instead that the principal causes were internal: army culture and bureaucracy, and their combined impact on the development of weapons and doctrine. Johnson examines the U.S. Army's innovations |
|
|
|
|