1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910808853403321

Autore

Westerdale Joel

Titolo

Nietzsche's aphoristic challenge / / Joel Westerdale

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Berlin ; ; Boston : , : De Gruyter Mouton, , [2013]

©2013

ISBN

3-11-048175-8

3-11-032432-6

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (196 p.)

Collana

Monographien und Texte zur Nietzsche-Forschung ; ; Band 64

Disciplina

838/.8

193

Soggetti

Aphorisms and apothegms

Literary style

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- List of Abbreviations and Sources -- Timeline of Key Publications Discussed and their Publishers -- Introduction. The Challenge -- Chapter One. “They’re aphorisms!” -- Chapter Two. Aphoristic Pluralism -- Chapter Three. The Aphoristic Option -- Chapter Four. An Anarchy of Atoms -- Chapter Five. An Art of Exegesis -- Chapter Six. The Nietzsche Function -- Chapter Seven. Excess and Ephexis -- Bibliography -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

The “aphoristic form causes difficulty,” Nietzsche argued in 1887, for “today this form is not taken seriously enough.” Nietzsche’s Aphoristic Challenge addresses this continued neglect by examining the role of the aphorism in Nietzsche’s writings, the generic traditions in which he writes, the motivations behind his turn to the aphorism, and the reasons for his sustained interest in the form. This literary-philosophical study argues that while the aphorism is the paradigmatic form for Nietzsche’s writing, its function shifts as his thought evolves. His turn to the aphorism in Human, All Too Human arises not out of necessity, but from the new freedoms of expression enabled by his critiques of language and his emerging interest in natural science. Yet the model interpretation of an aphorism Nietzsche offers years later in On the Genealogy of Morals tells a different story, revealing more about



how the mature Nietzsche wants his earlier works read than how they were actually written. This study argues nevertheless that consistencies emerge in Nietzsche’s understanding of the aphorism, and these, perhaps counter-intuitively, are best understood in terms of excess. Recognizing the changes and consistencies in Nietzsche’s aphoristic mode helps establish a context that enables the reader to navigate the aphorism books and better answer the challenges they pose.