|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910807997703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Botta Alejandro F. <1960-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The Aramaic and Egyptian legal traditions at Elephantine : an Egyptological approach / / Alejandro F. Botta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, NY, : T & T Clark, c2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-86804-7 |
9786612868047 |
0-567-15624-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (256 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Library of Second Temple studies ; ; 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Law - Egypt - Elephantine - History - To 1500 |
Manuscripts, Aramaic (Papyri) - Egypt - Elephantine |
Law, Ancient |
Jewish law - History - To 1500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [204]-233]) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; List of Tables; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION: THE EGYPTOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ARAMAIC LEGAL FORMULAE; Chapter 2 THE ELEPHANTINE COMMUNITY AND ARAMAIC LAW; Chapter 3 THE EGYPTIAN FORMULARY TRADITION; Chapter 4 CHALLENGING THE CONSENSUS: THE (omitted) CLAUSE; Chapter 5 THE 'WITHDRAWAL' AND RELATED FORMULAE IN THE ARAMAIC LEGAL TRADITION; Chapter 6 THE USE OF w(omitted)y IN THE EGYPTIAN LEGAL TRADITION; Chapter 7 A COMPARISON OF THE ARAMAIC AND EGYPTIAN USES OF WITHDRAWAL FORMULAE |
Chapter 8 RECONSIDERING THE ORIGINS OF ARAMAIC AND DEMOTIC LEGAL FORMULAEWORKS CITED; INDEX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This is a study of the interrelationships between the formulary traditions of the legal documents of the Jewish colony of Elephantine and the legal formulary traditions of their Egyptian counterparts. . The legal documents of Elephantine have been approached in three different ways thus far: first, comparing them to the later Aramaic legal tradition; second, as part of a self-contained system, and more recently from the point of view of the Assyriological legal tradition. However, |
|
|
|
|