1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910807328703321

Autore

Williams Michael A

Titolo

Rethinking "Gnosticism" : an argument for dismantling a dubious category / / Michael Allen Williams

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Princeton, N.J., : Princeton University Press, c1996

ISBN

1-4008-0853-7

9786612753190

1-282-75319-3

1-4008-2221-1

1-4008-1383-2

Edizione

[Course Book]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (356 pages)

Disciplina

299/.932

Soggetti

Gnosticism

Rome Religion

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. [311]-327) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front matter -- CONTENTS -- FIGURES AND TABLES -- PREFACE -- ABBREVIATIONS -- INTRODUCTION -- CHAPTER ONE. What Kind of Thing Do Scholars Mean by "Gnosticism"?. A LOOK AT FOUR CASES -- CHAPTER TWO. "Gnosticism" as a Category -- CHAPTER THREE. Protest Exegesis? or Hermeneutical Problem-Solving? -- CHAPTER FOUR. Parasites? or Innovators? -- CHAPTER FIVE. Anticosmic World-Rejection? or Sociocultural Accommodation? -- CHAPTER SIX. Hatred of the Body? or the Perfection of the Human? -- CHAPTER SEVEN. Asceticism . . . ? -- CHAPTER EIGHT . . . or Libertinism? -- CHAPTER NINE. Deterministic Elitism? or Inclusive Theories of Conversion? -- CHAPTER TEN. Where They Came From . . . -- CHAPTER ELEVEN . . . and What They Left Behind -- CONCLUSION -- NOTES -- MODERN WORKS CITED -- INDEX

Sommario/riassunto

Most anyone interested in such topics as creation mythology, Jungian theory, or the idea of "secret teachings" in ancient Judaism and Christianity has found "gnosticism" compelling. Yet the term "gnosticism," which often connotes a single rebellious movement against the prevailing religions of late antiquity, gives the false



impression of a monolithic religious phenomenon. Here Michael Williams challenges the validity of the widely invoked category of ancient "gnosticism" and the ways it has been described. Presenting such famous writings and movements as the Apocryphon of John and Valentinian Christianity, Williams uncovers the similarities and differences among some major traditions widely categorized as gnostic. He provides an eloquent, systematic argument for a more accurate way to discuss these interpretive approaches. The modern construct "gnosticism" is not justified by any ancient self-definition, and many of the most commonly cited religious features that supposedly define gnosticism phenomenologically turn out to be questionable. Exploring the sample sets of "gnostic" teachings, Williams refutes generalizations concerning asceticism and libertinism, attitudes toward the body and the created world, and alleged features of protest, parasitism, and elitism. He sketches a fresh model for understanding ancient innovations on more "mainstream" Judaism and Christianity, a model that is informed by modern research on dynamics in new religious movements and is freed from the false stereotypes from which the category "gnosticism" has been constructed.