|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910806943003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Proulx Vincent-Joël |
|
|
Titolo |
Transnational terrorism and state accountability : a new theory of prevention / / Vincent-Joël Proulx ; with a foreword by Bruno Simma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford, United Kingdom ; ; Portland, Oregon : , : Hart Publishing, , 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-4725-6619-X |
1-78225-037-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (379 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Hart monographs in transnational and international law ; ; v. 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Government liability |
Terrorism - Prevention - Law and legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
; Introduction -- State responsibility, terrorism and international law -- The impact of 9/11 on international law and beyond -- Unity through vagueness : the challenges of devising general rules of responsibility -- Rethinking the rationale underlying state responsibility for terrorism : trans-substantive rules, domestic analogies and the rationalist agenda -- Implementing a two-tiered strict liability-infused model. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"Every State has an obligation to prevent terrorist attacks emanating from its territory. This proposition stems from various multilateral agreements and UN Security Council resolutions. This study exhaustively addresses the scope of this obligation of prevention and the legal consequences flowing from its violation, so as to provide greater clarity on governments' counterterrorism duties and to enhance State accountability for preventable wrongs. It defines the contents and contours of the obligation while placing critical emphasis on the mechanics of State responsibility. Whether obscured by new technologies like the Internet, the sophisticated cellular structure of some terrorist organisations or convoluted political realities, the level of governmental involvement in terrorist activities is no longer readily discernible in every instance. Furthermore, the prospect of governments waging surrogate warfare through proxies also poses intractable challenges to the mechanism of attribution in the context of |
|
|
|
|