|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910806845303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Gleave R (Robert) |
|
|
Titolo |
Scripturalist Islam : the history and doctrines of the Akhbari Shii school / / by Robert Gleave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden ; ; Boston, : Brill, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-281-92647-7 |
9786611926472 |
90-474-2162-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (368 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Islamic philosophy, theology, and science, , 0169-8729 ; ; v. 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Akhbariyah - History |
Akhbariyah - Doctrines |
Shiah - Doctrines |
Shiah - History |
Islamic law |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [321]-333) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
The Akhbari-Usuli dispute and the early "Akhbari" school -- Muhammad Amin al-Astarabadi and the formation of the Akhbari school -- Astarabadi's legal thought -- Astarabadi's theological and philosophical thought -- The spread of Akhbarism after Astarabadi -- Defining the Akhbari-Usuli conflict -- Akhbari Quranic interpretation -- Sunna and the Akhbar in Akhbari jurisprudence -- Akhbari hermeneutics -- Conclusions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Akhbārī School dominated the intellectual landscape of Imāmī Shiʿism between the Seventeenth and early Nineteenth Centuries. Its principal doctrines involved a reliance on scripture (primarily the sayings or akhbār of the Shiʿite Imams) and a rejection of the rational exegetical techniques which had become orthodox doctrine in Imāmī theology and law. However, the Akhbārīs were not simple literalists, as they are at times portrayed in secondary literature. They developed a complex theory of exegesis in which texts could be interpreted, whilst at the same time remaining doggedly committed to the ability of the revelatory texts to provide answers to theological and legal questions |
|
|
|
|