|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910806829003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Porter Stanley E. <1956-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The criteria for authenticity in historical-Jesus research : previous discussion and new proposals / / Stanley E. Porter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
[London], : T & T Clark International, [2004] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-20029-5 |
9786613200297 |
0-567-52098-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (305 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Library of New Testament Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Reprint. Originally published: Sheffield : Sheffield Academic Press, 2000. Journal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ; 191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; List of Tables; Preface; Abbreviations; INTRODUCTION; Part I: PREVIOUS DISCUSSION; Chapter 1 THE 'THIRD QUEST' FOR THE HISTORICAL JESUS AND THE CRITERIA FOR AUTHENTICITY; Chapter 2 HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CRITERIA FOR AUTHENTICITY AND THE RISE OF FORM (AND REDACTION) CRITICISM; Chapter 3 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CRITERIA FOR AUTHENTICITY; Part II: NEW PROPOSALS; Chapter 4 THE CRITERION OF GREEK LANGUAGE AND ITS CONTEXT; Chapter 5 THE CRITERION OF GREEK TEXTUAL VARIANCE; Chapter 6 THE CRITERION OF DISCOURSE FEATURES; CONCLUSION; Bibliography; Index of References |
Index of AuthorsB; D; G; H; L; N; S; T; Y; Z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Historical-Jesus research continues to captivate the interests of scholars, and recently, there has been renewed discussion of the criteria for authenticity. The first half of this volume reviews the state of play in historical-Jesus research and examines the criteria in particular. One chapter is devoted to the so-called 'Quests', and a second critically charts the development of the criteria in the light of form criticism. One of the conclusions of this part of the volume is that |
|
|
|
|