Trust in international cooperation : international security institutions, domestic politics, and American multilateralism / / Brian C. Rathbun [[electronic resource]]

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910806249103321
• Autore: Rathbun Brian C. <1973->
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2012
• ISBN: 1-107-22993-6; 1-139-18003-7; 1-283-38261-X; 1-139-18981-6; 9786613382610; 1-139-04421-4; 1-139-18850-X; 1-139-18388-5; 1-139-19110-1; 1-139-18620-5
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (xiv, 253 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)
• Collana: Cambridge studies in international relations ; ; 121
• Classificazione: POL011000
• Disciplina: 327.1/7
• Soggetti: International cooperation; International organization
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Machine generated contents note: 1. Circles of trust: reciprocity, community and multilateralism; 2. Anarchical social capital: a social psychological theory of international cooperation and institutional design; 3. The open circle: the failure of the League of Nations; 4. Squaring the circle: the birth of the United Nations; 5. Closing the circle: the negotiation of the North Atlantic Treaty; 6. Coming full circle: fear, terrorism and the future of American multilateralism.
• Sommario/riassunto: Trust in International Cooperation challenges conventional wisdoms concerning the part which trust plays in international cooperation and the origins of American multilateralism. Brian C. Rathbun questions rational institutionalist arguments, demonstrating that trust precedes ; rather than follows the creation of international organizations. Drawing on social psychology, he shows that individuals placed in the same structural circumstances show markedly different propensities to cooperate based on their beliefs about the trustworthiness of others. Linking this finding to political psychology, Rathbun explains why liberals generally pursue a more multilateral foreign policy than conservatives, evident in the Democratic Party's greater support for a genuinely multilateral League of Nations, United Nations and North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Rathbun argues that the post-World War Two bipartisan consensus on multilateralism is a myth, and differences between the parties are growing continually starker.