|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910798190803321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Subjectivity : ancient and modern / / edited by R. J. Snell and Steven F. McGuire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Lanham, Maryland : , : Lexington Books, , 2016 |
|
©2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (263 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Contents; Introduction; Chapter 1. Subjectivity and Human Nature in Eric Voegelin's Reading of Aristotle; Response to Steven McGuire; Chapter 2. Objectivity as Authentic Subjectivity; Response to Elizabeth Murray; Chapter 3. Subjectivity without Subjectivism: Revisiting the Is/Ought Gap; Response to Sherif Girgis; Chapter 4. First- and Third-Person Standpoints in the New Natural Law Theory; Response to Christopher Tollefsen; Chapter 5. The Claims of Subjectivity and the Limits of Politics; Response to Ralph Hancock; Chapter 6. The Turn to the Subject as the Turn to the Person |
Response to David WalshChapter 7. Personalism and Common Good: Thomistic Political Philosophy and the Turn to Subjectivity; Response to V. Bradley Lewis; Chapter 8. Existential Authority, Belonging, and the Commissioning That Is Subjectivity: A Medieval Philosophical Anthropology; Response to James Greenaway; Index; About the Contributors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Modern thought is sometimes presented as introducing a "turn to the subject" absent from ancient and medieval thought, although the schools of thought associated with Bernard Lonergan, Eric Voegelin, Leo Strauss, and the new natural law theory often find subjectivity already operative in the older forms. In this volume, sixteen leading scholars examine the turn to the subject in modern philosophy and consider its historical antecedents in ancient and medieval thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|