|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910797893903321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Scrutinizing argumentation in practice / / edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, University of Amsterdam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , [2015] |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (353 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Argumentation in Context, , 1877-6884 ; ; volume 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Persuasion (Rhetoric) |
Discourse analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Foreword; PART I A general perspective applied to scientific controversies; Arguing in the Grooves; 1. Introduction; 2. Genre and language constraints; 2.1 Types of controversies and their resolution; 3. That woodpecker; 4. Arsenic-incorporating bacteria; 5. The hobbit; 6. Conclusion; References ; PART II Argumentation in a political context; Cultural differences in political debate; 1. Introduction; 2. The debates in context; 2.1 The 2010 British Prime Minister debates |
2.3 Argumentative acts between Pragma-dialectics and ScaPoLine3. Illustrative analysis; 3.1 Confrontation Stage coded through REPORTED-DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.2 Confrontation & Concluding Stage through NEGATIVE + DUBITATIVE SPEECH; 3.3 Argumentation Stage through QUOTED SPEECH; 4. Concluding; References ; A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. The implementation of pragmatic argumentation in legal justification as part of a stereotypical pattern of argumentation; 2.1 The argumentation on the first level of the main argumentation: Pragmatic argumentation |
2.2 The argumentation on the second and third level of the subordinate argumentation3. Exemplary analysis of the use of argumentation |
|
|
|
|