|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910797667903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Hicks Jonathan (Jonathan Douglas), <1984-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Trinity, Economy, and Scripture : Recovering Didymus the Blind / / Jonathan Douglas Hicks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Winona Lake, Indiana : , : Eisenbrauns, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (320 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Journal of theological interpretation supplements ; ; 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Trinity |
Holy Spirit |
History |
Early works. |
Criticism, interpretation, etc. |
Commentaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages 279-288) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Didymus' Authorship of De Trinitate: Status Quaestionis -- God the Trinity: Identity and Activity -- The Economy and Scripture -- The Moral Life and Its End -- The Contemplative Life and Eschatological Knowledge -- "Culling the flowers." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"The 4th-century teacher, Didymus the Blind, enjoyed a fruitful life as head of an episcopally-sanctioned school in Alexandria. Author of numerous dogmatic treatises and exegetical works, Didymus was considered a stalwart defender of the Nicene faith in his heyday. He duly attracted the likes of Jerome and Rufinus to his school. Contemporary scholarship has focused most of its attention on understanding him as an exegete, especially focusing on his exegetical vocabulary and the driving assumptions behind his particular method of reading Scripture. The theological literature has been somewhat neglected. In this study, Jonathan Hicks makes the claim that Didymus’s exegesis can only be understood in all its fullness in light of his theological commitments. His acute differences with Theodore of Mopsuestia on the proper reading of the prophet Zechariah cannot be |
|
|
|
|