|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910795016703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Chouraqui Frank |
|
|
Titolo |
Ambiguity and the absolute : Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty on the question of truth / / Frank Chouraqui |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York : , : Fordham University Press, , 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-8232-5414-3 |
0-8232-6111-5 |
0-8232-5413-5 |
0-8232-5412-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[First edition.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xviii, 304 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Perspectives in Continental Philosophy |
Perspectives in continental philosophy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Absolute, The |
Ambiguity |
Truth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- Preface -- Introduction -- 1 Nietzsche on Self-Differentiation and Genealogy -- 2 The Incorporation of Truth and the Symbiosis of Truth and Life -- 3 The Self-Becoming of the World and the Incompleteness of Being -- Transition: Vicious Circles, Virtuous Circles, and Meeting Merleau-Ponty in the Middle -- 4 The Origin of Truth -- 5 Existential Reduction and the Object of Truth -- 6 Merleau-Ponty’s “Soft” Ontology of Truth as Falsification -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Friedrich Nietzsche and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Chouraqui argues, are linked by how they conceive the question of truth. Although both thinkers criticize the traditional concept of truth as objectivity, they both find that rejecting it does not solve the problem. What is it in our natural existence that gave rise to the notion of truth?The answer to that question is threefold. First, Nietzsche and Merleau-Ponty both propose a genealogy of “truth” in which to exist means to make implicit truth claims. Second, both seek to recover the preobjective ground from which truth as an erroneous concept arose. Finally, this attempt at |
|
|
|
|