| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNIPARTHENOPE000027720 |
|
|
Autore |
C. Borgomeo&co |
|
|
Titolo |
4. Rapporto sul microcredito in Italia / C. Borgomeo&co |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Soveria Mannelli : Rubbettino, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collocazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910793661103321 |
|
|
Titolo |
American Parishes : Remaking Local Catholicism / / Gary J. Adler, Tricia C. Bruce, Brian Starks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, NY : , : Fordham University Press, , [2019] |
|
©2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (279 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Catholic Practice in North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
AdlerGary J |
AmmermanNancy |
BaneMary Jo |
BruceTricia C |
ColemanJohn A |
Garces-FoleyKathleen |
GrayMark M |
HooverBrett |
IrbyCourtney |
PrattTia Noelle |
StarksBrian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Catholics - United States |
Catholic Church - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction. What is a parish? why look at catholic parishes? -- 1. A brief history of the sociology of parishes in the united states -- 2. Studying parishes lessons and new directions from the study of congregations -- 3. The shifting landscape of us catholic parishes, 1998–2012 -- 4. Stable transformation catholic parishioners in the united states -- 5. Power in the parish -- 6. Liturgy as identity work in predominantly African American parishes -- 7. A house divided -- 8. Parishes as homes and hubs -- 9. Preparing to say “i do” -- 10. A sociologist looks at his own parish a conversation with john a. Coleman, SJ -- Conclusion. Parishes as the embedded middle of American Catholicism -- Acknowledgments -- Contributors -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Parishes are the missing middle in studies of American Catholicism. Between individual Catholics and a global institution, the thousands of local parishes are where Catholicism gets remade. American Parishes showcases what social forces shape parishes, what parishes do, how they do it, and what this says about the future of Catholicism in the United States. Expounding an embedded field approach, this book displays the numerous forces currently reshaping American parishes. It draws from sociology of religion, culture, organizations, and race to illuminate basic parish processes, like leadership and education, and ongoing parish struggles like conflict and multiculturalism. American Parishes brings together contemporary data, methods, and questions to establish a sociological re-engagement with Catholic parishes and a Catholic re-engagement with sociological analysis. Contributions by leading social scientists highlight how community, geography, and authority intersect within parishes. It illuminates and analyzes how growing racial diversity, an aging religious population, and neighborhood change affect the inner workings of parishes. Contributors: Gary J. Adler Jr., Nancy Ammerman, Mary Jo Bane, Tricia C. Bruce, John A. Coleman, S.J., Kathleen Garces-Foley, Mary Gray, Brett Hoover, Courtney Ann Irby, Tia Noelle Pratt, and Brian Starks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910220047103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Kurt Runge |
|
|
Titolo |
The Evolving Telomeres |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (74 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Frontiers Research Topics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
What controls the different rates of evolution to give rise to conserved and divergent proteins and RNAs? How many trials until evolution can adapt to physiological changes? Every organism has arisen through multiple molecular changes, and the mechanisms that are employed (mutagenesis, recombination, transposition) have been an issue left to the elegant discipline of evolutionary biology. But behind the theory are realities that we have yet to ascertain: How does an evolving cell accommodate its requirements for both conserving its essential functions, while also providing a selective advantage? In this volume, we focus on the evolution of the eukaryotic telomere, the ribo-nuclear protein complex at the end of a linear chromosome. The telomere is an example of a single chromosomal element that must function to maintain genomic stability. The telomeres of all species must provide a means to avoid the attrition from semi-conservative DNA replication and a means of telomere elongation (the telomere replication problem). For example, telomerase is the most well-studied mechanism to circumvent telomere attrition by adding the short repeats that constitutes most telomeres. The telomere must also guard against the multiple activities that can act on an unprotected double strand break requiring a window (or checkpoint) to compensate for telomere sequence loss as well as protection against non-specific processes (the telomere protection problem). This volume describes a range of methodologies including mechanistic studies, phylogenetic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
comparisons and data-based theoretical approaches to study telomere evolution over a broad spectrum of organisms that includes plants, animals and fungi. In telomeres that are elongated by telomerases, different components have widely different rates of evolution. Telomerases evolved from roots in archaebacteria including splicing factors and LTR-transposition. At the conserved level, the telomere is a rebel among double strand breaks (DSBs) and has altered the function of the highly conserved proteins of the ATM pathway into an elegant means of protecting the chromosome end and maintaining telomere size homeostasis through a competition of positive and negative factors. This homeostasis, coupled with highly conserved capping proteins, is sufficient for protection. However, far more proteins are present at the telomere to provide additional species-specific functions. Do these proteins provide insight into how the cell allows for rapid change without self-destruction? |
|
|
|
|
|
| |