International security in practice : the politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy / / Vincent Pouliot [[electronic resource]]

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910792355503321
• Autore: Pouliot Vincent <1979->
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2010
• ISBN: 1-107-20557-3; 1-282-53602-8; 9786612536021; 0-511-67828-2; 0-511-67702-2; 0-511-68151-8; 0-511-68349-9; 0-511-67618-2; 0-511-67953-X
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (xv, 282 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)
• Collana: Cambridge studies in international relations ; ; 113
• Classificazione: 89.70
• Disciplina: 327.4701821
• Soggetti: Security, International; Russia (Federation) Foreign relations
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Feb 2016).
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Introduction -- The logic of practicality : a theory of practice of security communities -- A "sobjective" methodology for the study of practicality -- The logic of practicality at the NATO-Russia council -- The early steps : NATO, Russia and the double enlargement, 1992-1997 -- The fallout : NATO and Russia from Kosovo to Georgia, 1998-2008 -- Conclusion.
• Sommario/riassunto: How do once bitter enemies move beyond entrenched rivalry at the diplomatic level? In one of the first attempts to apply practice theory to the study of International Relations, Vincent Pouliot builds on Pierre Bourdieu's sociology to devise a theory of practice of security communities and applies it to post-Cold War security relations between NATO and Russia. Based on dozens of interviews and a thorough analysis of recent history, Pouliot demonstrates that diplomacy has ; become a normal, though not a self-evident, practice between the two former enemies. He argues that this limited pacification is due to the intense symbolic power struggles that have plagued the relationship ever since NATO began its process of enlargement at the geographical and functional levels. So long as Russia and NATO do not cast each other in the roles that they actually play together, security community development is bound to remain limited.