1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910783766303321

Autore

Colker Ruth

Titolo

The disability pendulum [[electronic resource] ] : the first decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act / / Ruth Colker

Pubbl/distr/stampa

New York, : New York University Press, c2005

ISBN

0-8147-9037-2

1-4294-1395-6

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (262 p.)

Collana

Critical America

Disciplina

342.7308/7

Soggetti

People with disabilities - Legal status, laws, etc - United States - History - 20th century

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. 213-235) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Introduction : high hope followed by public backlash -- The ADA's journey through Congress -- ADA Title I : an empirical investigation -- The face of judicial backlash -- ADA Title II : the Supreme Court, the courts of appeals and the states : a swinging pendulum -- ADA Title III : a fragile compromise -- Dissing Congress.

Sommario/riassunto

Signed into law in July 1990, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective two years later, and court decisions about the law began to multiply in the middle of the decade. In The Disability Pendulum, Ruth Colker presents the first legislative history of the enactment of the ADA in Congress and analyzes the first decade of judicial decisions under the act. She assesses the success and failure of the first ten years of litigation under the ADA, focusing on its three major titles: employment, public entities, and public accommodations.The Disability Pendulum argues that despite an initial atmosphere of bipartisan support with the expectation that the ADA would make a significant difference in the lives of individuals with disabilities, judicial decisions have not been consistent with Congress’ intentions. The courts have operated like a pendulum, at times swinging to a pro-disabled plaintiff and then back again to a pro-defendant stance. Colker, whose work on the ADA has been cited by the Supreme Court, offers insightful and practical suggestions on where to amend the act to make it more effective in defending disability rights, and also



explains judicial hostility toward enforcing the act.

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910792310303321

Titolo

Reaffirming legal ethics : taking stock and new ideas / / edited by Kieran Tranter. [et al.]

Pubbl/distr/stampa

New York : , : Routledge, , 2010

ISBN

1-136-95476-7

1-136-95477-5

1-282-65965-0

9786612659652

0-203-84935-3

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (239 p.)

Collana

Routledge Research in Legal Ethics

Altri autori (Persone)

TranterKieran

Disciplina

174/.3

Soggetti

Legal ethics - United States

Law - Study and teaching - United States

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Book Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Contributors; 1 Introduction; 2 The philosophical foundations of legal ethics: a roundtable; 3 Personal integrity and professional ethics; 4 Legal advising and the rule of law; 5 Tales of terror: lessons for lawyers from the 'war on terrorism'; 6 Legal ethics in a post-Westphalian world: building the international rule of law and other tasks; 7 An opportunity for the ethical maturation of the law firm: the ethical implications of incorporated and listed law firms; 8 Carnegie's missing step: prescribing lawyer retraining

9 Professionalism and Pro Bono publico10 The psychology of good character: the past, present and future of good character regulation in Canada; 11 The 'self-regulation' misnomer; 12 Why good intentions are often not enough: the potential for ethical blindness in legal decision-making; Index

Sommario/riassunto

It has been over thirty years since the founding crises that birthed legal



ethics as both a field of study and a discrete field of law. In that time thinking about the ethical dimension of legal practice has taken several turns: from justifications of zealous advocacy, to questions of process and connections to specifically legal values, to more recently consideration of legal conduct as part of a wider field of virtue. Parallel to this dynamism of thought, there has also been significant changes in how legal professions, especially within those that possess a common law heritage, have been