Distorting the law [[electronic resource] ] : politics, media, and the litigation crisis / / William Haltom and Michael McCann

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910455103603321
• Autore: Haltom William
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Chicago, : University of Chicago Press, c2004
• ISBN: 1-282-42658-3; 0-226-31469-3; 9786612426582
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (361 p.)
• Collana: The Chicago series in law and society
• Altri autori (Persone): McCannMichael W. <1952->
• Disciplina: 346.7303
• Soggetti: Actions and defenses - Press coverage - United States; Torts - Press coverage - United States; Law in mass media; Law - Political aspects; Sociological jurisprudence; Electronic books.
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references (p. [307]-327) and index.
• Nota di contenuto: The social production of legal knowledge -- Pop torts : tales of legal degeneration and moral regeneration -- In retort : narratives versus numbers -- ATLA shrugged : plaintiffs' lawyers play defense -- Full tort press : media coverage of civil litigation -- Java jive : genealogy of a juridical icon -- Smoke signals from the tobacco wars -- Law through the looking glass of mass politics.
• Sommario/riassunto: In recent years, stories of reckless lawyers and greedy citizens have given the legal system, and victims in general, a bad name. Many Americans have come to believe that we live in the land of the litigious, where frivolous lawsuits and absurdly high settlements reign. Scholars have argued for years that this common view of the depraved ruin of our civil legal system is a myth, but their research and statistics rarely make the news. William Haltom and Michael McCann here persuasively show how popularized distorted understandings of tort litigation (or tort tales) have been perpetuated by the mass media and reform proponents. Distorting the Law lays bare how media coverage has ; sensationalized lawsuits and sympathetically portrayed corporate interests, supporting big business and reinforcing negative stereotypes of law practices. Based on extensive interviews, nearly two decades of newspaper coverage, and in-depth studies of the McDonald's coffee case and tobacco litigation, Distorting the Law offers a compelling analysis of the presumed litigation crisis, the campaign for tort law reform, and the crucial role the media play in this process.

Looking for rights in all the wrong places [[electronic resource] ] : why state constitutions contain America's positive rights / / Emily Zackin

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910792046003321
• Autore: Zackin Emily J. <1980->
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Princeton, NJ, : Princeton University Press, c2013
• ISBN: 1-299-33301-X; 1-4008-4627-7
• Edizione: [Core Textbook]
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (251 p.)
• Collana: Princeton studies in American politics : historical, international, and comparative perspectives
• Disciplina: 342.7308/5
• Soggetti: Civil rights - United States - States; Constitutional law - United States - States
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
• Nota di contenuto: Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Chapter 1. Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places -- Chapter 2. Of Ski Trails and State Constitutions -- Chapter 3. Defining Positive Rights -- Chapter 4. Why Write New Rights? -- Chapter 5. Education -- Chapter 6. Workers' Rights -- Chapter 7. Environmental Protection -- Chapter 8. Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Index -- Backmatter
• Sommario/riassunto: Unlike many national constitutions, which contain explicit positive rights to such things as education, a living wage, and a healthful environment, the U.S. Bill of Rights appears to contain only a long list of prohibitions on government. American constitutional rights, we are often told, protect people only from an overbearing government, but give no explicit guarantees of governmental help. Looking for Rights in ; All the Wrong Places argues that we have fundamentally misunderstood the American rights tradition. The United States actually has a long history of enshrining positive rights in its constitutional law, but these rights have been overlooked simply because they are not in the federal Constitution. Emily Zackin shows how they instead have been included in America's state constitutions, in large part because state governments, not the federal government, have long been primarily responsible for crafting American social policy. Although state constitutions, seemingly mired in trivial detail, can look like pale imitations of their federal counterpart, they have been sites of serious debate, reflect national concerns, and enshrine choices about fundamental values. Zackin looks in depth at the history of education, labor, and environmental reform, explaining why America's activists targeted state constitutions in their struggles for government protection from the hazards of life under capitalism. Shedding much-needed light on the variety of reasons that activists pursued the creation of new state-level rights, Looking for Rights in All the Wrong Places challenges us to rethink our most basic assumptions about the American constitutional tradition.