|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910791873603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Cooper Steven H. <1951-, > |
|
|
Titolo |
A disturbance in the field : essays in transference-countertransference engagement / / Steven H. Cooper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York : , : Routledge, , 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-135-23185-0 |
1-135-23186-9 |
1-283-04543-5 |
9786613045430 |
0-203-87178-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (250 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Relational perspectives book series ; ; v. 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Transference (Psychology) |
Psychoanalysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; Chapter 1 Introduction: The romance and melancholia of loving psychoanalysis; Chapter 2 The grandiosity of self-loathing: Transference-countertransference dimensions; Chapter 3 Privacy, reverie, and the analyst's ethical imagination; Chapter 4 The analyst's experience of being a transference object: An elusive form of countertransference to the psychoanalytic method?; Chapter 5 The analyst's anticipatory fantasies: Aid and obstacle to the patient's self-integration; Chapter 6 Psychoanalytic process: Clinical and political dimensions |
Chapter 7 Good enough vulnerability, victimization, and responsibility: Why one-and two-person models need one anotherChapter 8 The new bad object and the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis; Chapter 9 Franz Alexander's corrective emotional experience reconsidered; Chapter 10 Working through and working within: The continuity of enactment in the termination process; References; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The field, as Steven Cooper describes it, is comprised of the inextricably related worlds of internalized object relations and interpersonal interaction. Furthermore, the analytic dyad is neither |
|
|
|
|