1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910791846803321

Autore

Janušauskienė Diana

Titolo

Post-communist democratisation in Lithuania [[electronic resource] ] : elites, parties, and youth political organisations, 1988-2001 / / Diana Janušauskienė

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Amsterdam ; ; New York, : Rodopi, 2011

ISBN

1-282-99169-8

9786612991691

90-420-3250-2

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (183 p.)

Collana

On the boundary of two worlds ; ; 28

Disciplina

324.94

Soggetti

Democratization - Lithuania

Political parties - Lithuania

Lithuania Politics and government

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- Theorising Post-Communist Democratisation: The Role of Political Elites -- The New Political Scene in Lithuania -- Rising New Elites: A Case of Youth Political Organisations -- Conclusions -- Notes -- References -- The Content of the Questionnaires -- Description of the Respondents -- Summarised Data from the Survey of the Members of Youth Political Organisations -- Summarised Data of the Survey of Members of the Lithuanian Parliament in 1996-2000 -- About the Author.

Sommario/riassunto

Post-Communist Democratisation in Lithuania: Elites, Parties, and Youth Political Organisations. 1988 – 2001 explains post-communist changes in Lithuania. The transformation of political party system, political elites and youth political organisations in Lithuania are examined in light of democratisation in other post-communist countries. By linking theories of democratisation and elites to actual events, the book provides an analytical framework for interpreting political regime change and development in Lithuania. The book is based on five assumptions: (1) democratisation in Lithuania belongs to a ‘Western type’ of democratic development; (2) elites and nationalism



were the major forces in modernisation; (3) Lithuanian elites have used the favourable conditions of perestroika and were the major actors in regime transformation; (4) the crop of political elites in Lithuania undergoes a generational change, and youth political organisations are very important in this process as they serve as schools for future politicians; and (5) class theory is less useful than elite theory when analysing the process of democratisation in Lithuania.