|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910791174603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Başaran Betül |
|
|
Titolo |
Selim III, social control and policing in Istanbul at the end of the eighteenth century : between crisis and order / / Betül Basaran |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden, Netherlands : , : Brill, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (295 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Ottoman Empire and its Heritage, , 1380-6076 ; ; Volume 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Police - Turkey - Istanbul - History - 18th century |
Internal security - Turkey - Istanbul - History - 18th century |
Turkey History Selim III, 1789-1807 |
Istanbul (Turkey) Social life and customs 18th century |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preliminary Material -- Introduction -- The Eighteenth Century: Defining the Crisis -- Wartime Crisis and the New Order: The Policing of Istanbul, 1789–92 -- The Inspection Registers of 1791–93 -- “We Have No Security”: Public Order in the Neighborhood -- Concluding Remarks -- Appendix 4.1: List of shops and trades in the southern Golden Horn in 1792 -- Appendix 4.2: Distribution of inns according to location in the southern Golden Horn -- Bibliography -- Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In Selim III, Social Order and Policing in Istanbul at the End of the Eighteenth Century Betül Başaran examines Sultan Selim III’s social control and surveillance measures. Drawing mainly from a set of inspection registers and censuses from the 1790's, as well as court records she paints a colorful picture of the city’s residents and artisans. She argues that the period constitutes the beginnings of large-scale population control and crisis management and urges us to think about the Ottoman Empire as a polity that was increasingly becoming a “statistical” state, along with its contemporaries in Europe, and to go beyond mechanistic models of borrowing that focus primarily on military reform and European influence in our discussions of Ottoman reform and “modernity”. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|