| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996387757603316 |
|
|
Autore |
Whitgift John <1530?-1604.> |
|
|
Titolo |
The defense of the aunsvvere to the Admonition [[electronic resource] ] : against the replie of T.C. By Iohn VVhitgift Doctor of Diuinitie. In the beginning are added these. 4. tables. 1 Of dangerous doctrines in the replie. 2 Of falsifications and vntruthes. 3 Of matters handled at large. 4 A table generall |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Printed at London, : By Henry Binneman, for Humfrey Toye, Anno. 1574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
A reply to: Cartwright, Thomas. A replye to an answere made of M. Doctor Whitgifte. |
Running title reads: The defense of the answere to the Admonition. |
Includes index. |
"An examination of the places cited in the end of the Replie touching matters in controuersie", [12] p. at end. |
This edition has A1r catchword "fence"; errata on b8r. |
2D2 is a cancel. Some copies have slip-cancels at R4r, Y1v, and Y6v. |
Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910791025303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Bouquet Mary |
|
|
Titolo |
Academic Anthropology and the Museum [[electronic resource] ] : Back to the Future |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, NY, : Berghahn Books, 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (254 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
New Directions in Anthropology ; ; v.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Anthropological museums and collections -- History |
Anthropology -- Philosophy |
Museum exhibits -- History |
Museum techniques -- History |
Anthropology |
Social Sciences |
Anthropology - General |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Title Page; Table of Contents; List of Contributors; Chapter 1: Introduction; Part I: Anthropological encounters with the post-colonial museum; Chapter 2: The photological apparatus and the desiring machine. Unexpected congruences between the Koninklijk Muesum, Tervuren and the U'' mista Centre, Alert Bay; Chapter 3: Picturing the museum: photography and the work of mediation in the Third Portuguese Empire; Chapter 4: On the pre-museum history of Baldwin Spencer''s collection of Tiwi artefacts; Part II: Ethnographic museums and ethnographic museology ''at home'' |
Chapter 5: Anthropology at home and in the museum: the case of the Musee National des Arts et Traditions Popularies in ParisChapter 6: ''Does anthropology need museums?'' Teaching ethnographic museology in Portugal thirty years later; Part III: Science museums as an ethnographic challenge; Chapter 7: Towards an ethnography of museums: science, technology and us; Chapter 8: Behind the scenes at the Science Museum: knowing, making and using; Part IV: Anthropologists as cultural producers; Chapter 9: Unsettling the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
meaning: critical museology, art and anthropological discourses |
Chapter 10: Inside out: cultural production in the museum and the academyChapter 11: The art of exhibition-making as a problem of translation; Part V: Looking ahead; Chapter 12: Why post-millenial museums will need fuzzy guerrillas; Bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The museum boom, with its accompanying objectification and politicization of culture, finds its counterpart in the growing interest by social scientists in material culture, much of which is to be found in museums. Not surprisingly, anthropologists in particular are turning their attention again to museums, after decades of neglect, during which fieldwork became the hallmark of modern anthropology - so much so that the ""social"" and the ""material"" parted company so radically as to produce a kind of knowledge gap between historical collections and the intellectuals who might have benefitted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |