|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910790774403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Roberts Christopher (Lawyer) |
|
|
Titolo |
The British courts and extra-territoriality in Japan, 1859-1899 / / by Christopher Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden : , : Brill, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (474 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Consular jurisdiction |
Courts - Great Britain - History |
Exterritoriality |
Jurisdiction - Great Britain - History |
Great Britain Commerce Japan History |
Great Britain Foreign relations Japan |
Japan Commerce Great Britain History |
Japan Foreign relations Great Britain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preliminary Material / Robert Lanning -- British Extra-territoriality / Robert Lanning -- The Players in the Legal System / Robert Lanning -- Criminal Jurisdiction / Robert Lanning -- The Sea / Robert Lanning -- Civil Jurisdiction / Robert Lanning -- Appeals / Robert Lanning -- The Chishima-Ravenna Collision / Robert Lanning -- The End of Extra-Territoriality / Robert Lanning -- Conclusion / Robert Lanning -- Epilogue / Robert Lanning -- Appendices / Robert Lanning -- Sources and Bibliography / Robert Lanning -- Index / Robert Lanning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In The British Courts and Extra-territoriality in Japan, 1859-1899 , Christopher Roberts reviews the Courts' day-to-day workings and examines the nature of, and fluctuations in, their case-load. By examining the Courts’ case-load, it shows that, whilst some complaints that earlier commentators have made about the system’s structure and the Consuls’ lack of legal training and poor judgments may have been justified initially, the British authorities responded to them so that, over time, the Courts—and the practitioners within the system—came to |
|
|
|
|