1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910790491403321

Autore

Easter David

Titolo

Britain and the confrontation with Indonesia, 1960-1966 / / David Easter

Pubbl/distr/stampa

London ; ; New York : , : Tauris Academic Studies, , 2004

ISBN

0-85772-115-1

1-280-87678-6

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (272 p.)

Collana

International library of twentieth century history ; ; 1

Disciplina

327.410598/09/046

Soggetti

Great Britain Foreign relations Indonesia

Indonesia Foreign relations Great Britain

Great Britain Foreign relations 1945-1964

Great Britain Foreign relations 1964-1979

Great Britain Foreign relations Malaysia

Malaysia Foreign relations Great Britain

Indonesia Foreign relations Malaysia

Malaysia Foreign relations Indonesia

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Contents; List of Abbreviations; List of Key Office Holders; Map of Indonesia and Malaysia; Introduction; 1. The decision to form Malaysia, 1960-January 1962; 2. The Brunei revolt and the start of Confrontation, January 1962-April 1963; 3. Pressing ahead with Malaysia, April-Septemeber 1963; 4. Coping with the Confrontation, September 1963-April 1964; 5. Escalation and rethink, May-October 1964; 6. Labour and the Confrontation, October 1964-March 1965; 7. Exit Singapore, April-September 1965; 8. The coup attempt in Indonesia, September 1965-January 1966

Sommario/riassunto

The confrontation with Indonesia cut to the heart of Britain's desire to retain global power status in the 1960s and was central to decolonisation and British defence policy across South-East Asia. Factors such as the need to maintain a military base in Singapore drove strategy and this confrontation became a major commitment - close at



times to escalating into full-scale regional war._x000D_However, 'the Confrontation' was not recorded as a conflict of this scale, and Britain was cast into a passive and defensive role. Here, David Easter reveals a radically different view, persuasively making