|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910789792703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Williams Demetrius K |
|
|
Titolo |
Enemies of the cross of Christ [[electronic resource] ] : the terminology of the cross and conflict in Philippians / / Demetrius K. Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York, : Sheffield Academic, c2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-19380-9 |
9786613193803 |
0-567-17062-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (297 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Journal for the study of the New Testament. Supplement series ; ; 223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [253]-264) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
CONTENTS; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; INTRODUCTION; Chapter 1; Aoyos TOO Ixcxupou: THE 'DISCOURSE OF THE CROSS'; Chapter 2; THE LETTER OF PAUL TO THE PHILIPPIANS: SOME PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS; Chapter 3; 'EVEN DEATH ON A CROSS': A RHETORICAL EXEGETICAL EXAMINATION OF PHILIPPIANS 2.1-30; Chapter 4; 'WE ARE THE CIRCUMCISION': A RHETORICAL EXEGETICAL EXAMINATION OF PHILIPPIANS 3.1-21; Chapter 5; THE FUNCTION OF ' THE CROSS OF CHRIST' IN PAUL' S ARGUMENTATION; Bibliography; Index of References; Index of Authors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Enemies of the Cross' employs classical rhetorical analysis to examine how Paul structures a deliberative argument using his understanding of the 'cross of Christ'. His goals are to guide/advise the Philippian community through internal and external strife (ch. 2), combat his opponents (ch.3), and develop his notion of the eschatological community (3:18-21). Williams proposes that while Paul has a 'theology of the death of Jesus', of which cross terminology is one of several aspects, this terminology is used almost exclusively in polemical/conflictual contexts. Hence Paul appears to be using ' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|