| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910789111203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Sanders Melinda |
|
|
Titolo |
Breast pathology / / Melinda E. Sanders, Jean F. Simpson ; acquisitions editor Rich Winters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, New York : , : Demos Medical Publishing, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-78684-003-0 |
1-61705-117-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (324 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Consultant Pathology Series ; ; Volume 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Series Foreword; Foreword; Preface; Chapter 1: Alterations of Enlarged Lobular Units; 1.1 Enlarged Lobular Unit With Apocrine Change; 1.2 Columnar Cell Lesions Without Atypia; Case 1; Case 2; 1.3 Columnar Cell Lesions With Atypia; 1.4 Secretory Change; Chapter 2: Epithelial Proliferative Lesions; 2.1 Hyperplasia Without Atypia, Usual and Florid Patterns; 2.2 Usual Hyperplasia Without Atypia, ""Gynecomastoid Pattern""; Case 1; Case 2; 2.3 Usual Hyperplasia Without Atypia, Compact Pattern; 2.4 Papillary Apocrine Change; Case 1; Case 2 |
2.5 Usual Hyperplasia With Prominent Myoepithelial Cells2.6 Usual Hyperplasia With Clear Cells; 2.7 Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Cribriform Pattern; Case 1; Case 2; 2.8 Collagenous Spherulosis; Case 1; Case 2; 2.9 Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Solid Pattern; 2.10 Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Micropapillary Pattern; 2.11 Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia With Apocrine Cytology; 2.12 Hypersecretory Hyperplasia; 2.13 Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia in a Background of Hypersecretory Hyperplasia; 2.14 Florid Hyperplasia Involving a Papilloma |
2.15 Cells of Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia Admixed With Florid Hyperplasia, Involving an Intraductal Papilloma2.16 Collagenous Spherulosis Involving Micropapillomas; 2.17 Papilloma Involved by Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia; 2.18 Nipple Adenoma; 2.19 Mucocele-Like Lesion; 2.20 Mucocele-Like Lesion With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 3: Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Special Considerations; 3.1 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Low Grade, Minimal Example; 3.2 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, Solid Pattern Mimicking Lcis; 3.3 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, With Lobular Cytology; Case 1; Case 2 |
3.4 Spindle Cell Pattern Ductal Carcinoma3.5 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Florid-Like Pattern; 3.6 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Biphasic Pattern; 3.7 Apocrine Ductal Carcinoma In Situ; Case 1; Case 2; Case 3; 3.8 Micropapillary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ; 3.9 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Arising in a Background of Hypersecretory Hyperplasia; 3.10 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Involving Sclerosing Adenosis; Case 1; Case 2; 3.11 Displaced Epithelial Elements After Biopsy of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ; Case 1; Case 2; 3.12 Invasive Carcinoma Associated With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ |
3.13 Encysted Noninvasive Papillary Carcinoma3.14 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Involving a Papilloma With Areas of Pseudoinvasion; 3.15 Paget's Disease of the Nipple; 3.16 Toker Cells; 3.17 Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Tall Cell Pattern, Involving Papillomas; 3.18 Secretory Ductal Carcinoma In Situ; 3.19 Pagetoid Pattern Ductal Carcinoma In Situ; 3.20 Radiation Change Mimicking Ductal Carcinoma In Situ; Chapter 4: Lobular Neoplasia; 4.1 Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia With Involvement of Ducts; Case 1; Case 2; 4.2 Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ |
4.3 Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Involving a Fibroadenoma and an Adjacent Lobular Unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Based on actual cases drawn from the extensive breast pathology consultation practice at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Breast Pathology covers the full classification of breast tumors and focuses on especially challenging differential diagnoses or unusual and problematic morphologic presentations. Using a pattern-based approach, each case is presented as a difficult diagnostic choice with two or even three possible diagnoses for the pathologist. For each case there is a description illustrating an expert's diagnosis and analysis, along with commentary providing additional context on th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |