1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910789084803321

Titolo

The right to believe [[electronic resource] ] : perspectives in religious epistemology / / Dariusz ℗Łukasiewicz & Roger Pouivet (eds.)

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Frankfurt, : Ontos Verlag, 2012

ISBN

3-11-032016-9

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (244 p.)

Altri autori (Persone)

℗ŁukasiewiczDariusz

PouivetRoger

Soggetti

Belief and doubt

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction -- Russell's China Teapot / Inwagen, Peter van -- Religious Belief and Evidence from Testimony / Greco, John -- Steps Towards an Epistemology of Revelation / Pouivet, Roger -- Faith As an Epistemic Good According to Aristotle: / Bastit, Michel -- Aquinas and the Will to Believe / Michon, Cyrille -- To Be in Truth or not to Be Mistaken? / Gutowski, Piotr -- Do We Have the Epistemic Right to Believe in Jesus? / Wojtysiak, Jacek -- Religious Beliefs in the Face of Rationalism / Żegleń, Urszula M. -- Believing the Self-Contradictory / Schang, Fabien -- Logic, Right to Unbelief and Freedom / Woleński, Jan -- Scepticism and Religious Belief / Ziemińska, Renata -- Are We Morally Obliged to Be Atheists? / Łukasiewicz, Dariusz -- Can There Be Supernaturalism without Theism? / De Anna, Gabriele -- On the Interrelation between Forgiveness, Rationality and Faith / Heinzmann, Gerhard -- Transfiguration of Human Consciousness and Eternal Life / Judycki, Stanisław -- Notes on the Authors -- Index of Names

Sommario/riassunto

In the twentieth century, many contemporary epistemologists in the analytic tradition have entered into debate regarding the right to belief with new tools: Richard Swinburne, Anthony Kenny, Alvin Plantinga, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Peter van Inwagen (who contributes a piece in this volume) defending or contesting the requirement of evidence for any justified belief. The best things we can do, it seems, is to examine more attentively the true notion of "right to believe", especially about



religious matters. This is exactly what authors of the papers in this book do.