|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910788489203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Vgenopoulos Maximos |
|
|
Titolo |
Primacy in the church from Vatican I to Vatican II : an orthodox perspective / / Maximos Vgenopoulos ; foreword by His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew ; Shaun Allshouse, design |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
DeKalb, Illinois : , : NIU Press, , 2013 |
|
©2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-5017-5128-X |
1-60909-098-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (227 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
NIU Series in Orthodox Christian Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Popes - Primacy |
Episcopacy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Foreword -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- CHAPTER ONE. Vatican I -- CHAPTER TWO. The Aftermath of Vatican I -- CHAPTER THREE. Vatican II -- CHAPTER FOUR. Orthodox Reactions to Vatican II -- General Conclusions -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The primacy of the bishop of Rome, the pope, as it was finally shaped in the Middle Ages and later defined by Vatican I and II has been one of the thorniest issues in the history of the Western and Eastern Churches. This issue was a primary cause of the division between the two Churches and the events that followed the schism of 1054: the sack of Constantinople by the crusaders in 1204, the appointment by Pope Innocent III of a Latin patriarch of Constantinople, and the establishment of Uniatism as a method and model of union. Always a topic in ecumenical dialogue, the issue of primacy has appeared to be an insurmountable obstacle to the realization of full unity between Roman Catholicism and the Orthodox Christianity. In this timely and comprehensive work, Maximos Vgenopoulos analyzes the response of major Orthodox thinkers to the Catholic understanding of the primary of the pope over the last two centuries, showing the strengths and |
|
|
|
|