1.

Record Nr.

UNISA990000326200203316

Autore

PEDRAZZA GORLERO, Maurizio

Titolo

Le fonti del diritto : lezioni / Maurizio Pedrazza Gorlero

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Padova : CEDAM, 1995

ISBN

88-13-19155-3

Descrizione fisica

X, 140 p. ; 24 cm

Disciplina

349.45

Soggetti

Diritto - Italia - Fonti

Collocazione

IG IV 965

Lingua di pubblicazione

Italiano

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910788192003321

Autore

Onfray Michel

Titolo

Appetites for thought : philosophers and food / / Michel Onfray

Pubbl/distr/stampa

London, England : , : Reaktion Books, , 2015

©2015

ISBN

1-78023-455-4

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (138 p.)

Disciplina

190

Soggetti

Food - Philosophy

Ethics

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

Cover; Appetites for Thought: Philosophers and Food; Imprint Page; Contents; Introduction: The Banquet of the Omnivores; One: Diogenes;  or, The Taste of Octopus; Two: Rousseau;  or, The Milky Way; Three:



Kant;  or, Ethical Alcoholism; Four: Fourier;  or, The Pivotal Little Pie; Five: Nietzsche;  or, The Sausages of the Anti-Christ; Six: Marinetti;  or, The Excited Pig; Seven: Sartre;  or, The Revenge of the Crustaceans; Conclusion: The Gay Science of Eating; References; Bibliography

Sommario/riassunto

Appetites for Thought offers up a delectable intellectual challenge: can we better understand the concepts of philosophers from their culinary choices? Guiding us around the philosopher's banquet table with erudition, wit, and irreverence, Michel Onfray offers surprising insights on foods ranging from fillet of cod to barley soup, from sausage to wine and coffee.Tracing the edible obsessions of philosophers from Diogenes to Sartre, Onfray considers how their ideas relate to their diets. Would Diogenes have been an opponent of civilization without his taste for raw octopus? Would Rousseau have