|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910788180403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Burnett Guy F. <1979-> |
|
|
Titolo |
The safeguard of liberty and property : the Supreme Court, Kelo v. New London, and the takings clause / / Guy F. Burnett |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Lanham : , : Lexington Books, , [2015] |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-7391-9785-1 |
0-7391-9784-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (177 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Eminent domain - United States |
New London (Conn.) Trials, litigation, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Based on author's dissertation (dcotoral - Claremont Graduate University), 2013. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- The facts of the case and the original decisions -- The object of society : the amicus briefs and oral argument -- The evolving public use clause : the majority opinion -- At a loss what expedient to substitute : the concurring opinion -- Merely incidental benefits : O'connor's dissenting opinion -- Something has gone seriously awry : Thomas's dissenting opinion -- More like a living nightmare than a dream : the Kelo backlash -- Conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
<span><span>This book is an in-depth analysis of the case law and popular backlash to the Supreme Court case </span><span style=""font-style:italic;"">Kelo v. New London</span><span> (2005). Using a variety of legal, academic, legislative, media, and popular sources, it examines and establishes the Court's most recent interpretation of property rights, eminent domain, and popular reaction to the interpretation. </span></span><br /><span><span> </span></span><br /><span><span> </span></span> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|