| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910787982103321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Accès À L'eau Pour Les Agricultrices Saheliennes : Enjeux Pour Une Démocratie Inclusive / / editeurs, Rosnert Ludovic Alissoutin, Ramata Molo Thioune |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland : , : Project Muse, , 2014 |
|
Baltimore, Md. : , : Project MUSE, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (196 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Women's rights - Senegal |
Women's rights - Niger |
Women's rights - Mauritania |
Women in development - Senegal |
Women in development - Niger |
Women in development - Mauritania |
Water-supply - Economic aspects - Senegal |
Water-supply - Economic aspects - Niger |
Water-supply - Economic aspects - Mauritania |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Title page; Copyright page; Biographie; Remerciements; Sommaire; Préface; Avant Propos; Introduction; Liste Des Sigles et Abréviations; Liste des tableaux et figures; Chapitre 1 -Repères méthodologiques; Chapitre 2: MauritanieLe Paradoxe Mauritanien: Des Textes Neutres, Mais Des PratiquesDiscriminatoires; Introduction; Une demande nouvelle et persistante : les droits économiques,sociaux et culturels; Une question difficile : force et limite du cadre juridique; Statut de la femme mauritanienne et discriminations liéesaux facteurs socio-culturels |
Acteurs institutionnels chargés de la gestion de l'eauAccès effectif des |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
femmes à la terre; Accès à l'eau à usage agricole; Des traditions et coutumes foncières misogynes àl'acquisition administrative; Perceptions et changements souhaités; Chapitre 3: Niger. Au coeur de la marginalisation des femmes en milieu rural nigérien : Cas de l'accès à l'eau à usageagricole; Introduction; Un cadre juridique et politique favorable aux droitséconomiques des femmes; La marginalisation des femmes dans les périmètresIrrigués; Les facteurs explicatifs de la marginalisation desFemmes |
Chapitre 4: Sénégal. Accès Des Femmes A L'eau A Usage Agricole: Des Initiatives Encore BalbutiantesIntroduction; Des textes non discriminatoires en apparence, mais peusensibles au genre; Des disparités de genre persistantes; Des initiatives correctives prises; mais insuffisantes; D'où l'intérêt du plaidoyer pour l'accès équitable desfemmes à l'eau à usage agricole; Perspectives pour le rééquilibrage des rapports de genre; Conclusion Générale; Back cover |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This collective work was conducted within the context of the research project entitled "Effectiveness of women's economic rights: the case of access to water for agricultural use in Mauritania, Niger and Senegal". Initiated by the African Network for Integrated Development (RADI) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), it aims to explain the origins, manifestations and consequences of the gender divide with regards to access, use and control of productive water. Beyond its significance for research, this issue is also relevant to the dynamic protection of women's economic rights in the Sahelian environment where the difficult collection of water and the issues pertaining to poverty generate tensions between various consumption needs and interests. The correlation between the research results obtained in the three countries emerges as a critical lesson on the investigative approach, which is fundamentally marked by gender, participation and comparison, and also outlines the ways in which to promote women's equitable access to economic resources, in particular their access to water reserved for agricultural use. In this light, one of the novelties of this sub-regional scientific initiative is the establishment of a transnational advocacy committee responsible for promoting the implementation of the recommendations of the research. This means that the research-action process is far from being completed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |