|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910787648503321 |
|
|
Autore |
Atkins Jed W. |
|
|
Titolo |
Cicero on politics and the limits of reason : the republic and laws / / Jed W. Atkins [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-50299-3 |
1-139-89364-5 |
1-107-50138-5 |
1-107-50675-1 |
1-107-51716-8 |
1-107-49744-2 |
1-107-50407-4 |
1-107-33872-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xiv, 270 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Cambridge classical studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Political science - Rome - History |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction; 1. Reading the Republic; 2. The dream of Scipio and the science of politics; 3. Constitutional change and the mixed constitution; 4. Political society and citizens' rights; 5. Natural law; 6. Legislation for the best practicable regime; Conclusion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
A prolific philosopher who also held Rome's highest political office, Cicero was uniquely qualified to write on political philosophy. In this book Professor Atkins provides a fresh interpretation of Cicero's central political dialogues - the Republic and Laws. Devoting careful attention to form as well as philosophy, Atkins argues that these dialogues together probe the limits of reason in political affairs and explore the resources available to the statesman given these limitations. He shows how Cicero appropriated and transformed Plato's thought to forge original and important works of political philosophy. The book demonstrates that Cicero's Republic and Laws are critical for understanding the history of the concepts of rights, the mixed constitution and natural law. It concludes by comparing Cicero's |
|
|
|
|