1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910787135603321

Titolo

The science and theology of Godly love / / edited by Matthew T. Lee and Amos Yong ; Julia Fauci, design ; contributors Paul Alexander [and eleven others]

Pubbl/distr/stampa

DeKalb, Illinois : , : NIU Press, , 2012

©2012

ISBN

1-5017-5790-3

1-60909-057-8

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (243 p.)

Disciplina

231/.6

Soggetti

God - Worship and love

God - Love

Religion and science

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Includes index.

Nota di contenuto

""Contents""; ""Introduction""; ""Part I�Theology and Godly Love""; ""One�Godly Love""; ""Two�Agape, Self-Sacrifice, and Mutuality""; ""Three�Imago Dei and Kenosis""; ""Four�Violence and Nonviolence in Conceptualizations of Godly Love""; ""Five�Testing Creaturely Love and God�s Causal Role""; ""Part II�Social Science and Godly Love""; ""Six�Methodological Agnosticism for the Social Sciences?""; ""Seven�Godly Love from the Perspective of Psychology""; ""Eight�Sociology, Philosophy, and the Empirical Study of Godly Love""

""Nine�Socialization, Empirical Studies, and Godly Love""""Ten�Toward a Grounded Theory of Godly Love""; ""Conclusion""; ""Contributors""; ""INDEX""

Sommario/riassunto

Arguing that there are ways to move beyond the limitations of methodological atheism without compromising scientific objectivity, the essays gathered in The Science and Theology of Godly Love explore the potential for collaboration between social science and theology. They do so within the context of the interdisciplinary study of Godly Love, which examines the perceived experience of loving God, being loved by God, and thereby being motivated to engage in selfless service



to others. This volume serves as an introduction to and a call for further research in this new field of study, offering ten methodological perspectives on the study of Godly Love written by leading social scientists and theologians.Drawing on the work of Douglas Porpora and others, the contributors contend that agnosticism is the appropriate methodological stance when religious experience is under the microscope. Godly Love does not force a theistic explanation on data, instead these essays show that it sensitizes researchers so that they can take seriously the faith and beliefs of those they study without the assumption that these theologies represent an incontestable truth.