| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910787070703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Grammaticalization - theory and data / / edited by Sylvie Hancil, University of Rouen ; Ekkehard König, Free University Berlin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (301 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Studies in Language Companion Series (SLCS) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Grammar, Comparative and general - Grammaticalization |
Linguistic change |
Computational linguistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Grammaticalization - Theory and Data; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgements ; Introduction; Part 1. General and theoretical issues; Part 2. Case studies; References; Acquisition-based and usage-based explanations of grammaticalisation; 1. Generative vs. functional approaches; 2. Integration: Performance and parametrisation; 3. Case examples; 3.1 Romance futures; 3.2 German perfect (cf. Öhl 2009a); 3.3 Remarks on the auxiliation of the copula; 4. Conclusion; References; Grammaticalization and explanation; 1. Introduction; 2. A background of consensus |
3. Arguments against the explanatory potential of grammaticalization4. In defense of the explanatory potential of grammaticalization; 5. Unidirectionality, the process question, and reductionism; Unidirectionality; Process vs. Processes; Reductionism; 6. Concluding remarks; References; The perfectivization of the English perfect; 1. Introduction; 2. The perfectivisation of the HAVE-perfect - prototypical grammaticalization?; 3. The changing perfect in English; a. HAVE-perfects with definite past time adverbials; b. Narrative HAVE-perfects |
4. An increase in HAVE-perfect with past time adverbials?5. Which |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
English are we discussing?; 6. Conclusion; References; Explaining language structure; 1. Introduction; 2. Questions; 3. Reconstruction; 4. Conclusions; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; References; Toward a constructional framework for research on language change; 1. Introduction; 2. The main features of the constructionalization model; 3. A constructional approach to grammaticalization; 4. A constructional approach to lexicalization; 5. Major similarities and differences between contentful and procedural constructionalization |
6. The value added of a constructional approachData Bases; References; Grammaticalization of Polish mental predicate prefixes; 1. Introduction; 2. Grammaticalization; 3. Prefix semantics and its contribution to the meaning of the mental verb; 4. Classification of prefixes into pure perfectivizers and lexical prefixes: A case study on the verb myśleć 'to think'; 5. Conclusions; References; More thoughts on the grammaticalization of personal pronouns; 1. Introduction; 2. Referential shifting from third to second person: Heine and Song (2010, 2011) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Mulder and Thompson (2006, 2008) point out that the final hanging but ([X but]) developed from initial but (X [but Y]) through a sequence of formal reanalyses, and insightfully observe the functional and formal parallelism between the development of the hanging type of final but and the final particalization of the Japanese subordinator -kedo. The present article demonstrates that but (and and as well) can perform a terminal bracketing function and serve as functional subordinators in spoken American English, and that they behave like final particles when the sentences are truncated. Although |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910825755203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Rose Stephany <1978-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Abolishing white masculinity from Mark Twain to hiphop : crises in whiteness / / Stephany Rose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Lanham, Maryland ; ; Plymouth, England : , : Lexington Books, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-4985-2284-X |
0-7391-8123-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (203 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
American literature - History and criticism |
White people in literature |
Masculinity in literature |
White people - Race identity - United States |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
ABOLISHING WHITE MASCULINITY FROM MARK TWAIN TO HIPHOP; CONTENTS; Acknowledgements; Introduction: Writing Whiteness: White Authors and Hegemonic White Masculinities; Chapter One: 2000 and Late?: Passé Conversations on Race for a Post-Racial Nation; Chapter Two: "The Shame Is Ours, Not Theirs": Mark Twain's Battle with Racialism; Chapter Three: Invented Li(v)es: Gradations of Whiteness in F. Scott Fitzgerald's Tribal Twenties; Chapter Four: Dispossessing Race: Abolishing Whiteness in Adam Mansbach's Angry Black White Boys; Conclusion: Dreaming of Post-Racism in a Racial Wonderland |
BibliographyIndex; About the Author |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Abolishing White Masculinity from Mark Twain to Hiphop, a groundbreaking text in critical whiteness studies and literary criticism, looks toward white American male literature explicitly for racialized social commentary on the construction of whiteness, as an identity and power source. Works of Mark Twain, F. Scott Fitzgerald and Adam Mansbach are probed for inward projections of imaginative fissures concerning the construction of white masculinity as ultimate representations of white identity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |