|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910786709403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Scherkoske Greg <1969-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Integrity and the virtues of reason : leading a convincing life / / Greg Scherkoske [[electronic resource]] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-107-23394-1 |
1-107-34387-9 |
1-107-34876-5 |
1-107-34762-9 |
1-107-34137-X |
0-511-73227-9 |
1-107-34512-X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (x, 264 pages) : digital, PDF file(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Two cheers for integrity" -- 2. Integrity and moral danger -- 3. Might integrity be an intellectual virtue" -- 4. Integrity and self-trust -- 5. Integrity, assurance and responsibility -- 6. Integrity and impartial morality -- 7. Integrity and impartial morality -- Postscript: the moral importance of leading a convincing life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Many people have claimed that integrity requires sticking to one's convictions come what may. Greg Scherkoske challenges this claim, arguing that it creates problems in distinguishing integrity from fanaticism, close-mindedness or mere inertia. Rather, integrity requires sticking to one's convictions to the extent that they are justifiable and likely to be correct. In contrast to traditional views of integrity, Scherkoske contends that it is an epistemic virtue intimately connected to what we know and have reason to believe, rather than an essentially moral virtue connected to our values. He situates integrity in the context of shared cognitive and practical agency and shows that the relationship between integrity and impartial morality is not as antagonistic as many have thought - which has important implications |
|
|
|
|