| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910459862603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Onuora Adwoa Ntozake <1982-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Anansesem : telling stories and storytelling African maternal pedagogies / / Adwoa Ntozake Onuora |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bradford, ON : , : Demeter Press, , [2015] |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xi, 138 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Storytelling |
Discourse analysis, Narrative |
Education - Biographical methods |
Autobiography - Authorship |
Motherhood |
Electronic books. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"Anansesem: Telling Stories and Storytelling African Maternal Pedagogies is a composite story on African-Canadian mothers' experiences of teaching and learning while mothering. It seeks to celebrate the African mother's everyday experiences and honour her embodied and cultural knowledges as important sites of meaning making and discovery for the African child. Through the Afro-indigenous art of Anansi storytelling, memoir, creative non-fiction and illustrations, the author takes you on an evocative narrative journey that focuses on how African descended women draw upon and are central to African childrens' cultural, social and identity development. In entering these stories, readers access their joys, sadness, strengths and weaknesses as they mother in the midst of marginalization. The book is a testament to the power of counter-storytelling for inspiring internal and external transformation."-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910786624603321 |
|
|
Autore |
Chernoff Fred |
|
|
Titolo |
Explanation and progress in security studies : bridging paradigm divides in international relations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Stanford, California, : Stanford University Press, 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (324 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Stanford Security Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
International relations - Methodology |
International relations - Philosophy |
Security, International |
Internationale relationer |
International sikkerhed |
Explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Preface -- Introduction -- 1. Traditions of Explanation and the Idea of Scientific Progress -- 2. Explanation in the Natural and Social Sciences -- 3. The Nuclear Proliferation Debate -- 4. The Balance-of-Power Debate -- 5. The Democratic Peace Debate -- 6. Analysis, Alternatives, Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Explanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have—and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions. To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
democracies? The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |