|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910786576303321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Landmark cases in equity / / edited by Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; ; Portland, Oregon : , : Hart Publishing, , 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-84731-975-0 |
1-4742-0079-6 |
1-283-86340-5 |
1-84731-974-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (751 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Equity - England |
Equity - Wales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Papers presented at a 2-day conference at the Faculty of Laws, University College of London. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cover; Prelims; Preface; Contents; Contributors; Table of Cases; Table of Legislation; 1. The Earl of Oxford's Case (1615); 2. Coke v Fountaine (1676); 3. Grey v Grey (1677); 4. Penn v Lord Baltimore (1750); 5. Burgess v Wheate (1759); 6. Morice v Bishop of Durham (1805); 7. Tulk v Moxhay (1848); 8. Prince Albert v Strange (1849); 9. Ramsden v Dyson (1866); 10. Bishop of Natal v Gladstone (1866); 11. Earl of Aylesford v Morris (1873); 12. Re Hallett's Estate (1879-80); 13. North-West Transportation Co Ltd v Beatty (1887); 14. Rochefoucauld v Boustead (1897); 15. Re Earl of Sefton (1898) |
16. Nocton v Lord Ashburton (1914)17. Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver (1942); 18. National Anti-Vivisection Society v Inland Revenue Commissioners (1948); 19. National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth (1965); 20. Boardman v Phipps (1967); 21. Pettitt v Pettitt (1970) and Gissing v Gissing (1971); 22. Paragon Finance plc v DB Thakerar & Co (a firm) (1999); Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Continuing in the 'Landmark Cases' series, this is a collection of essays on a series of landmark cases in the development of equitable doctrine running from the seventeenth century to recent times. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|