|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910786542403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez Francisco José <1961-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Cognitive modeling : a linguistic perspective / / Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Alicia Galera Masegosa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands ; ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (260 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Human Cognitive Processing, , 1387-6724 ; ; Volume 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Cognitive grammar |
Psycholinguistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Cognitive Modeling; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; Chapter1. Introduction; 1. Aims and scope of the book; 2. Methodology and data; 3. A note on cognitive reality; 4. The structure of the book; Chapter2. Theoretical pre-requisites; 1. Introduction: In search for a unified framework of analysis; 1.1 Standards of adequacy; 1.2 The Equipollence Hypothesis; 2. An overview of the Lexical Constructional Model; 2.1 Levels of description and explanation; 2.2 Interaction within and across levels; 2.3 Constraints on subsumption |
2.4 The Lexical Constructional Model in the context of Cognitive Semantics and Construction Grammar(3. Figurative thought and figurative uses of language; 3.1 Metaphor and metonymy; 3.2 Overstatement: Hyperbole and auxesis; 3.3 Understatement, meiosis and litotes; 3.4 Irony; 3.4.1 Verbal irony: An overview; 3.4.2 Verbal irony vs. situational irony; 3.4.3 Sarcasm; 3.5 Paradox and oxymoron; Chapter3. Cognitive models; 1. Introduction; 2. Cognitive model types; 2.1 Frames, domains, and spaces; 2.2 Primary, low-level and high-level cognitive models |
2.3 Propositional vs. situational cognitive models2.3.1 High and low-level propositional models; 2.3.2 High and low-level situational models; 2.4 Scalar versus non-scalar cognitive models; 3. Cognitive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
models and a typology of states of affairs; 4. Cognitive models and the Lexical Constructional Model; Chapter4. Cognitive operations; 1. Introduction; 2. Formal operations; 2.1 Cueing; 2.2 Selection; 2.3 Abstraction; 2.4 Integration; 2.5 Substitution; 3. Content operations: A preliminary exploration; 3.1 Expansion and reduction; 3.2 Correlation; 3.3 Comparison; 3.4 Echoing |
3.5 Strengthening and mitigation3.6 Parameterization; 3.7 Saturation; 4. Patterns of combination of cognitive operations; 4.1 Metaphoric complexes; 4.1.1 Metaphoric amalgams; 4.1.2 Metaphoric chains; 4.2 Metaphtonymy; 4.2.1 Metonymic expansion of the metaphoric source; 4.2.2 Metonymic expansion of the metaphoric target; 4.2.3 Metonymic reduction of the metaphoric source; 4.2.4 Metonymic reduction of one of the correspondences of the metaphoric target; 4.3 Metonymic complexes; 4.3.1 Double metonymic expansion; 4.3.2 Double metonymic reduction; 4.3.3 Metonymic reduction plus metonymic expansion |
4.3.4 Metonymic expansion plus metonymic reduction4.4 Other patterns of metaphor-metonymy combinations; 4.4.1 Metonymic chains within metaphoric mappings; 4.4.2 Metonymic developments within metaphoric complexes; 5. Constraining principles on cognitive operations; 5.1 Constraints on formal operations; 5.1.1 Principle of Conceptual Consistency; 5.1.2 Conceptual Combination Principle; 5.2 Constraints on content operations; 5.2.1 The Extended Invariance Principle; 5.2.2 The Correlation Principle; 5.2.3 The Mapping Enforcement Principle; 5.2.4 Principle of Scalar Symmetry |
5.2.5 Principle of Scalar Pragmatic Adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This monograph studies cognitive operations on cognitive models across levels and domains of meaning construction. It explores in what way the same set of cognitive operations, either in isolation or in combination, account for meaning representation whether obtained on the basis of inferential activity or through constructional composition. As a consequence, it makes explicit links between constructional and figurative meaning. The pervasiveness of cognitive operations is explored across the levels of meaning construction (argument, implicational, illocutionary, and discourse structure) disti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |