|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910786308703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
(Re)presentations and dialogue [[electronic resource] /] / edited by François Cooren, Alain Létourneau |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., c2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-283-89521-8 |
90-272-7316-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (364 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
CoorenFrançois |
LétourneauAlain <1959-> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
(Re)presentations and Dialogue; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of contents; Introduction; References; Dialogue; 1. The issue; 2. Searching for our object 'dialogue'; 3. Identifying our scientific interest; 4. The order of object and representation; 5. How to derive methodology from the object: Basic guidelines; 6. Sample analyses; 7. The authentic text: Object or representation?; 8. Change in theorizing; References; Towards an inclusive notion of dialog for ethical and moral purposes; 1. Introduction; 2. Standpoints of this paper |
3. Distinction and unity between the ethical and the moral 4. Common points and differences between two specific traditions of dialog's application; 5. Argumentation and negotiation; 6. Strategy to avoid dogmatism and relativism; 7. More details on the steps to treat a question according to Legault; 8. Dialog as participation: About the Bohm-Isaacs school; 9. Competence and dialog; 10. Concluding remarks: These processes considered as representation; References; Dogmatic dialogue; 1. Introduction; 2. The judicial problem |
3. Background on the dispute, Appellate court practice, and the case: The dispute about same-sex marriage 3.1 Appellate court practice; 3.2 Washington supreme court and Andersen v. King county; 4. Method and materials; 5. Dialogic strategies in the law: Representing disagreeing others; 6. Context-spanning strategies; 7. Appellate law grounded practices; 8. Discussion and final thoughts; References; Representing |
|
|
|
|