1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910785991603321

Titolo

Computational models of argument [[electronic resource] ] : Proceedings of COMMA 2012 / / edited by Bart Verheij, Stefan Szeider and Stefan Woltran

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Amsterdam, : IOS Press, 2012

ISBN

1-299-33330-3

1-61499-111-1

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (536 p.)

Collana

Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications Computational models of argument

Altri autori (Persone)

VerheijBart

SzeiderStefan

WotlranStefan

Disciplina

003.5

Soggetti

Artificial intelligence - Computer simulation

Reasoning - Computer simulation

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Title Page; Preface; Programme Committee; Additional Reviewers; Contents; Part I. Invited Talks; The Long and Winding Road: Forty Years of Argumentation; Formal Dialectic: From Aristotle to Pragma-Dialectics, and Beyond; Multiple Logics Within Argument: How Defeasible and Classical Reasoning Work Together; Part II. Innovative Applications; Some Facets of Argument Mining for Opinion Analysis; An Inquiry Learning Environment for Scientific Argumentation; Semi-Automated Argumentative Analysis of Online Product Reviews; Arguing with Preferences in EcoBioCap

An Analysis and Hypothesis Generation Platform for Heterogeneous Cancer DatabasesMaking Sense of Macro- and Micro-Argumentation in Policy-Deliberation: Visualisation Techniques and Representation Formats; Towards an Argument-Based Music Recommender System; Arguing About Firewall Policy; Part III. Regular Papers; A General QBF-Based Formalization of Abstract Argumentation Theory; Some Foundations for Probabilistic Abstract Argumentation; Argument Aggregation: Basic Axioms and Complexity Results; The Equational Approach to CF2 Semantics



Argumentation Games for Admissibility and Cogency CriteriaUniform Argumentation Frameworks; Dishonest Arguments in Debate Games; On the Use of Presumptions in Structured Defeasible Reasoning; Automated Deployment of Argumentation Protocols; On Preferred Extension Enumeration in Abstract Argumentation; Towards Experimental Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation; A Dialogue Game for Coalition Structure Generation with Self-Interested Agents; Complexity of Logic-Based Argumentation in Schaefer's Framework; Argumentation Dialogues for Two-Agent Conflict Resolution

Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation SemanticsComputational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics; Tactics and Concessions for Argumentation-Based Negotiation; Default Reasoning About Actions via Abstract Argumentation; Resolutions in Structured Argumentation; Mechanism Design for Argumentation-Based Persuasion; Persuasion Strategies for Argumentation About Plans; Selecting Extensions in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks; Group Persuasion Through Uncertain Audience Modelling; On Input/Output Argumentation Frameworks; Dialogue Templates for Automatic Argument Processing

Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-Like Value GraphsInterchanging Arguments Between Carneades and AIF; Towards Argument-Based Foundation for Sceptical and Credulous Dialogue Games; The Structure of Ad Hominem Dialogues; Towards Argumentation About Subjective Probabilities; Argument Schemes for Reasoning About Trust; Clarifying Some Misconceptions on the ASPIC+ Framework; Generating Abstract Arguments: A Natural Language Approach; Towards Argumentation with Symbolic Dempster-Shafer Evidence; Conditional Acceptance Functions; Grounded Semantics as Persuasion Dialogue

Picking the Right Expert to Make a Debate Uncontroversial