|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910785933703321 |
|
|
Titolo |
How not to be governed [[electronic resource] ] : readings and interpretations from a critical anarchist left / / edited by Jimmy Casas Klausen and James Martel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Lanham, Md., : Lexington Books, c2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-7391-5036-7 |
1-283-61407-3 |
9786613926524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (224 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
KlausenJimmy Casas <1976-> |
MartelJames R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction : how not to be governed / James Martel & Jimmy Casas Klausen -- Anarchist methods and political theory / Jacqueline Stevens -- An anarchism that is not anarchism : notes toward a critique of anarchist imperialism / George Ciccariello-Maher -- Beside the state : anarchist strains in Cuban revolutionary thought / Katherine Gordy -- Kant via Ranciè€re : from ethics to anarchism / Todd May -- Nietzsche, aristocratism, and non-domination / Vanessa Lemm -- Max Stirner, postanarchy avant la lettre / Banu Bargu -- The late Foucault's premodernity / Jimmy Casas Klausen -- The ambivalent anarchism of Hannah Arendt / James Martel -- Emma Goldman and the power of revolutionary love / Keally McBride -- "This is what democracy looks like" / Elena Loizidou. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
How Not to Be Governed explores the contemporary debates and questions concerning anarchism in our own time. The authors address the political failures of earlier practices of anarchism, and the claim that anarchism is impracticable, by examining the anarchisms that have been theorized and practiced in the midst of these supposed failures. The authors revive the possibility of anarchism even as they examine it with a critical lens. Rather than breaking with prior anarchist practices, |
|
|
|
|