1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910785888803321

Titolo

Special issue [[electronic resource] ] : the discourse of judging / / edited by Austin Sarat

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Bingley, U.K., : Emerald, 2012

ISBN

1-283-58876-5

9786613901217

1-78052-871-X

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (168 p.)

Collana

Studies in law, politics, and society, , 1059-4337 ; ; v. 58

Altri autori (Persone)

SaratAustin

Disciplina

306.2

Soggetti

Political Science - Political Process - General

Political Science - Political Freedom & Security - Human Rights

Law & society

Politics & government

Sociological jurisprudence

Political sociology

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.

Nota di contenuto

Judging without rights : public reason and the counter-majoritarian difficulty / Sonu Bedi -- On politics and law : recovering the Pritchett Synthesis / John Brigham -- "Don't they understand judicial independence?" : discourses of judging in undergraduate legal studies classrooms : judicial retention and same-sex marriage rulings / Renee Ann Cramer -- Kentucky's constitutional crisis and the many meanings of judicial independence / Emily Zackin -- Nomos and form : reading a jury of her peers / Matthew Anderson -- Talking about the European court : discourses of judging in the European Union / R. Daniel Kelemen.

Sommario/riassunto

This special issue of Studies in Law, Politics, and Society focuses on the discourse of judging and the "language of judging" within many diverse legal scenarios. The volume features chapters specifically on: the "language of rights" within the context of abortion and same-sex marriage cases; discourses within the European Court of Justice; the modern-day place of politics in the US Supreme Court; and discussions



on the two-court crisis which lead to the US Constitutional Convention of 1849. The chapters question the complex and conflicting relationship between politics and the law, understanding judicial independence, and offer an analysis of how the literary narrative of law plays a significant part in the delivery of legal judgement.