|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910785452203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Mayhew Robert |
|
|
Titolo |
The female in Aristotle's biology [[electronic resource] ] : reason or rationalization / / Robert Mayhew |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Chicago, : University of Chicago Press, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-93284-5 |
9786612932847 |
0-226-51202-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (149 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 119-124) and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front matter -- Contents -- Preface -- Abbreviations -- One. Aristotle and "Ideology" -- Two. Entomology -- Three. Embryology -- Four. Eunuchs and Women -- Five. Anatomy -- Six. The Softer and Less Spirited Sex -- Seven. Aristotle on Females: An Assessment of the Biology -- References -- Index Locorum -- Index of Names -- General Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
While Aristotle's writings on biology are considered to be among his best, the comments he makes about females in these works are widely regarded as the nadir of his philosophical oeuvre. Among many claims, Aristotle is said to have declared that females contribute nothing substantial to generation; that they have fewer teeth than males; that they are less spirited than males; and that woman are analogous to eunuchs. In The Female in Aristotle's Biology, Robert Mayhew aims not to defend Aristotle's ideas about females but to defend Aristotle against the common charge that his writings on female species were motivated by ideological bias. Mayhew points out that the tools of modern science and scientific experimentation were not available to the Greeks during Aristotle's time and that, consequently, Aristotle had relied not only on empirical observations when writing about living organisms but also on a fair amount of speculation. Further, he argues |
|
|
|
|