|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910785209803321 |
|
|
Autore |
Novick Tzvi |
|
|
Titolo |
What is good, and what God demands [[electronic resource] ] : normative structures in tannaitic literature / / by Tzvi Novick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Leiden ; ; Boston, : Brill, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-94887-3 |
9786612948879 |
90-04-18829-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (260 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Supplements to the Journal for the study of Judaism ; ; v. 144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Rabbinical literature - History and criticism |
Jewish law - Interpretation and construction |
Tannaim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [217]-228) and an indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Preliminary Material / T. Novick -- Introduction / T. Novick -- Chapter One. Categorical Oppositions / T. Novick -- Chapter Two. Teleological Mitzvah / T. Novick -- Chapter Three. Scripture And World: Between The Schools Of R. Akiva And R. Ishmael / T. Novick -- Chapter Four. The Normative Realm As Mitzvah / T. Novick -- Chapter Five. "One Need Not Scruple": Law As Intrusion / T. Novick -- Chapter Six. Cautious Actors / T. Novick -- Chapter Seven. Eager Observance / T. Novick -- Chapter Eight. Exemplarity / T. Novick -- Conclusion / T. Novick -- Bibliography / T. Novick -- Index Of Names / T. Novick -- Index Of Sources / T. Novick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The normative rhetoric of tannaitic literature (the earliest extant corpus of rabbinic Judaism) is predominantly deontological. Prior scholarship on rabbinic supererogation, and on points of contact with Greco-Roman virtue discourse, has identified non-deontological aspects of tannaitic normativity. However, these two frameworks overlook precisely the productive intersection of deontological with non-deontological, the first because supererogation defines itself against obligation, and the second because the Greco-Roman comparate discourages serious treatment of law-like elements. This book |
|
|
|
|