|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910785064703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Yoreh Tzemah <1978-> |
|
|
Titolo |
First book of God [[electronic resource] /] / Tzemah L. Yoreh |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin ; ; New York, : de Gruyter, c2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-67309-2 |
9786612673092 |
3-11-022168-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (305 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Beihefte zur zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft ; ; Bd. 402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
E document (Biblical criticism) |
Documentary hypothesis (Pentateuchal criticism) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Book of E -- 3. The Elohistic Abraham Cycle -- 4. The Elohistic Jacob Cycle -- 5. The Elohistic Joseph Cycle -- 6. The Elohistic Moses Cycle -- 7. The Elohistic Balaam Cycle -- 8. Angels and the Tent of Meeting in the J and E Corpuses -- 9. Summary -- 10. Appendix: Did J Believe or Accept the Centralization of Cult -- Backmatter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In this book the author thoroughly examines the pentateuchal elohistic source, its structural unity and its relationship to the yahwistic source. His conclusions differ considerably from the accepted paradigm in the following ways: 1) In contrast to current scholarly opinions, it is assumed that E is the first basic pentateuchal source and that it predates J. J functions as E's first supplementary redactor - much as F. M. Cross, among others, conceived of P's redaction of J. 2) The name "Elohim" is used exclusively by the elohistic source even after Exodus 3 while the verses in Exodus 3 revealing Yahweh's name can be shown to be later additions. 3) Instead of the fragmentary source described by scholars, this study demonstrates the literary unity of E. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|