1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910785060803321

Autore

Tarnopolsky Christina H. <1964->

Titolo

Prudes, perverts, and tyrants [[electronic resource] ] : Plato's Gorgias and the politics of shame / / Christina H. Tarnopolsky

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Princeton, NJ, : Princeton University Press, c2010

ISBN

1-282-64504-8

9786612645044

1-4008-3506-2

Edizione

[Course Book]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (235 p.)

Disciplina

170

Soggetti

Shame - Political aspects

Democracy - Philosophy

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Part One. Plato'S Gorgias and the Athenian Politics of Shame -- Chapter One. Shame and Rhetoric in Plato's Gorgias -- Chapter Two. Shaming Gorgias, Polus, and Callicles -- Chapter Three. Plato on Shame in Democratic Athens -- Chapter Four. Socratic vs. Platonic Shame -- Part Two. Plato's Gorgias and the Contemporary Politics of Shame -- Chapter Five. Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato and the Contemporary Politics of Shame and Civility -- Chapter Six. What's so Negative about the "Negative" Emotions? -- Bibliography -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

In recent years, most political theorists have agreed that shame shouldn't play any role in democratic politics because it threatens the mutual respect necessary for participation and deliberation. But Christina Tarnopolsky argues that not every kind of shame hurts democracy. In fact, she makes a powerful case that there is a form of shame essential to any critical, moderate, and self-reflexive democratic practice. Through a careful study of Plato's Gorgias, Tarnopolsky shows that contemporary conceptions of shame are far too narrow. For Plato, three kinds of shame and shaming practices were possible in democracies, and only one of these is similar to the form condemned



by contemporary thinkers. Following Plato, Tarnopolsky develops an account of a different kind of shame, which she calls "respectful shame." This practice involves the painful but beneficial shaming of one's fellow citizens as part of the ongoing process of collective deliberation. And, as Tarnopolsky argues, this type of shame is just as important to contemporary democracy as it was to its ancient form. Tarnopolsky also challenges the view that the Gorgias inaugurates the problematic oppositions between emotion and reason, and rhetoric and philosophy. Instead, she shows that, for Plato, rationality and emotion belong together, and she argues that political science and democratic theory are impoverished when they relegate the study of emotions such as shame to other disciplines.