|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910784277703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Cowan David (David S.) |
|
|
Titolo |
The appeal of internal review : law, administrative justice, and the (non-) emergence of disputes / David Cowan and Simon Halliday with Caroline Hunter, Paul Maginn, and Lisa Naylor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-4725-5948-7 |
1-280-80123-9 |
9786610801237 |
1-84731-238-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (232 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Public welfare administration - Law and legislation - England |
Administrative remedies - England |
Homeless persons - England |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages [213]-220) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1 INTRODUCTION -- 2 HOMELESSNESS LAW AND INTERNAL REVIEW IN CONTEXT -- 3 SOUTHFIELD COUNCIL -- 4 BRISFORD COUNCIL -- 5 UNDERSTANDING THE FAILURE TO PURSUE INTERNAL REVIEW -- 6 UNDERSTANDING THE PURSUIT OF INTERNAL REVIEW -- 7 LAWYERS AND OTHER COPING STRATEGIES -- 8 CONCLUSION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Why do most welfare applicants fail to challenge adverse decisions despite a continuing sense of need? The book addresses this severely under-researched and under-theorised question. Using English homelessness law as their case study,the authors explore why homeless applicants did -- but more often did not -- challenge adverse decisions by seeking internal administrative review. They draw out from their data a list of the barriers to the take up of grievance rights. Further, by combining extensive interview data from aggrieved homeless applicants with ethnographic data about bureaucratic decision-making, they are able to situate these barriers within the dynamics of the citizen-bureaucracy relationship. Additionally, they point to other contexts which inform applicants' decisions about |
|
|
|
|