1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910783904803321

Titolo

Hans Eysenck : consensus and controversy / / edited by Sohan Modgil and Celia Modgil ; concluding chapter by Hans Eysenck

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Philadelphia : , : Falmer Press, , 1986

ISBN

1-135-38970-5

1-138-97580-X

1-135-38971-3

0-203-21479-X

9786610094257

1-280-09425-7

1-282-37295-5

9786612372957

0-203-29944-2

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (444 p.)

Collana

Falmer international master-minds challenged ; ; 2

Altri autori (Persone)

ModgilSohan

ModgilCelia

EysenckH. J <1916-1997.> (Hans Jurgen)

Disciplina

150

150.924

Soggetti

Psychology

Psychotherapy

Social psychology

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

Nota di contenuto

Book Cover; Half-Title; Title; Copyright; Acknowledgments; Contents; Dedication; Part I: Introduction; 1. Hans Eysenck: Consensus and Controversy; INTRODUCTION; CONTINUING THE DEBATE: THE STRATEGY OF THE BOOK; REFERENCES; Part II: Introduction Chapter; 2. Introductory Chapter; Part III: Behavioural Genetics; 3. Eysenck's Contributions to Behaviour Genetics; PREVIOUS WORK ON THE CAUSES OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN PERSONALITY AND ATTITUDES; THE TWIN SAMPLE; TESTS; 1 Delusions-Symptoms-States Inventory: Anxiety and Depression Scales (DSSI/sAD); 2 Eysenck Personality Questionnaire



(EPQ)

3 Conservatism Scale (C-Scale)METHODS FOR TESTING HYPOTHESES; RESULTS; Scaling; Distribution of Scores and Sex Differences; Repeatability; Correction for Sex Differences and Regression on Age; Genetical Analysis of Trait Variation; Anxiety; Depression; Extraversion; Psychoticism; Neuroticism; Lie; Conservatism; Correlations between Personality and Attitude Scores; Causes of Covariation between Anxiety, Depression and Neuroticism; DISCUSSION; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS; REFERENCES; 4. H.J.Eysenck and Behaviour Genetics: A Critical View; AN EARLY EXAMPLE: NEUROTICISM

A MODERN INSTANCE: EXTRA VERSION, NEUROTICISM, PSYCHOTICISMINTELLIGENCE; IN CONCLUSION; REFERENCES; Interchange; EAVES REPLIES TO LOEHLIN; LOEHLIN REPLIES TO MARTIN AND JARDINE; Part IV: Personality; 5. Major Contributions to the Psychology of Personality; BUILDING ON EYSENCK'S FOUNDATIONS; Specifying Facets of the Global Domains; Adding New Domains; CONCLUSIONS; REFERENCES; 6. Eysenck's Contribution to the Psychology of Personality; NOTE; REFERENCES; Interchange; COSTA AND McCRAE REPLY TO CLARIDGE; CLARIDGE REPLIES TO COSTA AND McCRAE; Part V: Intelligence; 7. The Theory of Intelligence

BackgroundPhilosophy of Science; Overview of Eysenck's Contributions; 1 The Limitations of Factor Analysis; 2 The Fractionation of g; 3 Reaction Time and Intelligence; The Physiological Basis of Intelligence; REFERENCES; 8. Eysenck on Intelligence: A Critical Perspective; APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF INTELLIGENCE; Ethological; Psychometric; Binetian; Piagetian; Information Processing; Physiological; THREE MAJOR ISSUES; Genetic versus Environmental Effects on Intelligence; The Competence-Performance Distinction; Galtonian Measures of Intelligence

The Hendrickson Model and Average Evoked PotentialInspection Time; Reaction Time; SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS; REFERENCES; Interchange; JENSEN REPLIES TO CARLSON AND WIDAMAN; CARLSON AND WIDAMAN REPLY TO JENSEN; REFERENCES; Part VI: Social Attitudes; 9. The Psychological Bases of Political Attitudes and Interests; EYSENCK'S THEORY OF POLITICAL ATTITUDES; OBJECTIONS-ANCIENT AND MODERN; THE ACCEPTABLE FACE OF PSYCHOTICISM; THE DYNAMICS OF 'LEGITIMIST' AND 'UTOPIAN' POLITICS; REFERENCES; 10. Eysenck on Social Attitudes: An Historical Critique; REFERENCES; Interchange; BRAND REPLIES TO RAY

REFERENCES

Sommario/riassunto

During the last forty years, Hans Eysenck's brilliant contribution to knowledge has beenwell-known world-wide. From its early transmission, his work has not been without itscritics. Naturally, criticisms persist, although his work continues to be frequentlyacknowledged with great admiration in the channels of psychology. With such prolificwork, it would seem justified to consider the discrepancies, the omissions, together withthe various interpretations which have been and are currently being highlighted.