|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910783891403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Mulgan Aurelia George |
|
|
Titolo |
Japan's interventionist state : the role of the MAFF / / Aurelia George Mulgan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London ; ; New York : , : RoutledgeCurzon, , 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-134-27947-7 |
1-134-27948-5 |
1-280-09980-1 |
0-203-32664-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (313 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Nissan Institute/Routledge Japanese Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Agriculture and state - Japan |
Japan Commercial policy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages [270]-281) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Contents; List of illustrations; Preface; Introduction; The interventionist state model; Modes and means of government intervention; Theorising government intervention and bureaucratic self-interest; The MAFF and agricultural intervention; The MAFF; Modes and means of agricultural intervention; Agricultural intervention and bureaucratic self-interest; The pursuit of MAFF interests in intervention; Maintaining the foundations of MAFF intervention; The three pillars of MAFF agricultural policy; Conclusion |
Appendix: Agriculture and agriculture-related organisations and their Japanese titles Notes; English language bibliography; Japanese language bibliography; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Japan's Interventionist State gives a detailed examination of Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and its role in promoting, protecting and preserving the regime of agricultural support and protection. This account is integral to the author's extended and multidimensional explanation for why Japan continues to provide high levels of assistance to its farmers and why it continues to block market access concessions in the WTO and other agricultural trade talks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|