|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910783815403321 |
|
|
Autore |
Kibel Paul Stanton |
|
|
Titolo |
The earth on trial : environmental law on the international stage / / Paul Stanton Kibel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York : , : Routledge, , 1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-135-96258-8 |
1-135-96259-6 |
1-280-31681-0 |
0-203-90180-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (215 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Environmental law, International |
Conservation of natural resources - Law and legislation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [163]-186) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Contents; First Ink: Publication Credits; Acknowledgments; Acronym List; Introduction: Sharp Teeth; City Limits: Urban Ecology and Economic Justice; Roughshod: Northwest Forests and the Constitution; Blaming Wildlife: The Endangered Endangered Species Act; Words to Choke On: Free Speech and Environmental Debate; Ignorance Abroad: International Projects Under National Law; Axe to the Myth: Canadian Logging and International Law; Ecology After the USSR: Hard Times for Russian Environmental Law; United by Poison: Relief for Bhopal's Victims |
Refoliating Vietnam: A Second War for the ForestsA Difficult Swim: The Sea Turtle Navigates GATT; Trees Falling: Forests and the Timber Trade; The Depths of Europe: Lessons for North America; Conclusion: Commonplace Ideas; Selected Resource Guide; Selected Bibliography; Suggested Further Reading; Notes; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Earth on Trial examines the degree to which the law has accommodated an increased understanding of the natural environment. Paul Stanton Kibel provides a clear assessment of what conceptual and practical changes are needed to reconcile law to the limits of ecology. By moving the debate between law and the environment beyond |
|
|
|
|