|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910783760903321 |
|
|
Autore |
Chamberlin John <1942-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Medieval arts doctrines on ambiguity and their place in Langland's poetics [[electronic resource] /] / John Chamberlin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Montreal ; ; Ithaca, [N.Y.], : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-282-85877-7 |
9786612858772 |
0-7735-6858-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (198 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Ambiguity in literature |
Poetics - History - To 1500 |
Aesthetics, Medieval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Front Matter -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Lexical Ambiguity in the Arts of Discourse and in Piers Plowman -- Lexical Ambiguity: Context, Ground, and Overview -- Augustine on Ambiguity -- The Twelfth Century and Arts of Discourse -- Piers Plowman: The Resources of Ambiguity in the Samaritan’s Sermon -- Transition -- The Ambiguity of Words-as-Words in the Arts of Discourse and in Piers Plowman -- Words-as-Words: Context, Ground, and Overview -- Augustine on Words-as-Words -- The Twelfth Century and Words-as-Words -- Piers Plowman and the Ambiguity of Words-as-Words -- Conclusion -- Works Cited -- Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Chamberlin's focal point for this synthesis is the concept of ambiguity, which has played an important role in the liberal arts tradition and in medieval discourses regarding reading and preaching - discourses that are fundamental to Langland's poetic ways with words. His work takes its place among other recent attempts to retrieve medieval literary theory, making it possible for it to inform the reading of medieval literature, but places this theory within a particularly wide context. Chamberlin claims that the excess of meaning ambiguity gives language is at least as important to the understanding of Piers |
|
|
|
|