1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910783757203321

Autore

Neill Elizabeth <1962->

Titolo

Rites of privacy and the privacy trade [[electronic resource] ] : on the limits of protection for the self / / Elizabeth Neill

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Montreal ; Ithaca, : McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001

ISBN

1-282-85887-4

9786612858871

0-7735-6870-0

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (208 p.)

Disciplina

323.44/8

Soggetti

Privacy, Right of

Droit à la vie privée

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front Matter -- Contents -- Diagrams -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- The Ontological Structure of Natural Rights -- Distinguishing between Privacy and Autonomy -- Defending the Ontological Theory -- Why Privacy? -- Transgressing Privacy: The Theory Applied to Trade -- Conclusion -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

In Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade Neill constructs an original theory of natural rights and human dignity to ground our right to privacy, arguing that privacy and autonomy are innate natural properties metaphorically represented on the moral level and socially bestowed. She develops her position by drawing on works in history, sociology, metaphor, law, and the moral psychology of Lawrence Kohlberg. The resulting theory provides surprising answers to controversial and pressing questions regarding, for instance, our right to privacy for medical records in various contexts and in relation to various authority structures, including government. Neill demonstrates that, while we have some entitlement to protection of privacy, entitlement does not have the moral scope suggested by currently entrenched legal and social norms. She cautions against some of the privacy privileges we currently enjoy - referring specifically to claims



such as those against insurance companies to prevent access to medical records - and suggests that if they are to be continued, respect for privacy is not the reason.